<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Notes | Chen Xing</title>
    <link>https://chenxing.space/notes/</link>
      <atom:link href="https://chenxing.space/notes/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Notes</description>
    <generator>Wowchemy (https://wowchemy.com)</generator><language>en-us</language>
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Causal Inference Notes</title>
      <link>https://chenxing.space/notes/causal-inference/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://chenxing.space/notes/causal-inference/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My study notes on causal inference and causal machine learning, arranged as a reading path. Each chapter builds on the previous ones, but every note can be read on its own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;1-start-here&#34;&gt;1. Start here&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overviews and reading lists to get oriented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/2024-01-13-causal-inference-model-review/causal-inference-model-assumptions/&#34;&gt;A Review of Causal Inference Methods&lt;/a&gt; — twelve methods, from DiD, IV and RD to causal forests and DML, compared side by side.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/2023-12-14-learning-resource-causal-inference/learning-resource-causal-inference/&#34;&gt;Learning Resource: Causal Inference&lt;/a&gt; — videos, courses and reading lists on theory, R, Python, DiD and synthetic control.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/learning-resource-causal-machine-learning-with-doubleml/&#34;&gt;Learning Resource: Causal Machine Learning with DoubleML&lt;/a&gt; — an introduction to double machine learning, with learning resources.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;2-selection-on-observables&#34;&gt;2. Selection on observables&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unconfoundedness: weighting, outcome modeling, and combining the two.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-propensity-score/&#34;&gt;Notes on Propensity Score Methods&lt;/a&gt; — the propensity score for dimension reduction, stratification, weighting and balance (Ding 2024).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/how-to-adjust-censoring-bias-and-confounding-bias-with-ip-weights/&#34;&gt;Adjust Censoring and Confounding Bias by IP Weighting&lt;/a&gt; — inverse probability weights for confounding and right censoring in survival data.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/intuition-for-doubly-robust-estimator/&#34;&gt;Intuition for Doubly Robust Estimator&lt;/a&gt; — why combining a propensity model and an outcome model protects against misspecification.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/balancing-weights-for-causal-inference/&#34;&gt;Balancing Weights for Causal Inference&lt;/a&gt; — choosing weights to balance covariates directly.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/aipw-vs-residual-on-residual-regression-non-parametric-flexibility-or-efficiency/&#34;&gt;AIPW vs. Residual-on-Residual Regression&lt;/a&gt; — the nonparametric AIPW estimator versus the partially linear residual-on-residual estimator.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;3-debiased-machine-learning-and-semiparametric-theory&#34;&gt;3. Debiased machine learning and semiparametric theory&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why ML nuisance estimates can still give valid inference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/study-notes-on-semiparametric-models/&#34;&gt;Notes on Semiparametric Models&lt;/a&gt; — tangent spaces, nuisance tangent spaces and efficient estimation.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/from-donsker-classes-to-neyman-orthogonality-the-power-of-dml/&#34;&gt;From Donsker Classes to Neyman Orthogonality&lt;/a&gt; — how orthogonality and cross-fitting replace Donsker conditions.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/orthogonal-vs-non-orthogonal-learning/&#34;&gt;Orthogonal vs Non-orthogonal Learning&lt;/a&gt; — a simulation comparing naive and Neyman-orthogonal estimators.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/big-picture-of-debiased-machine-learning/&#34;&gt;Big Picture of Debiased Machine Learning&lt;/a&gt; — DML as a generic recipe: a plug-in estimator plus a correction term.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/big/&#34;&gt;A Road Map of Nonparametric Efficiency in Causal Inference&lt;/a&gt; — efficiency bounds, the efficient influence function and its link to the Riesz representer (Kennedy 2023).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/what-is-the-critical-radius-in-riesz-regression/&#34;&gt;What is the Critical Radius in Riesz Regression?&lt;/a&gt; — the complexity measure behind Riesz representer rates.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/calibrate-your-nuisances-a-simple-fix-for-doubly-robust-inference/&#34;&gt;Calibrate Your Nuisances&lt;/a&gt; — calibrating nuisance estimates for doubly robust inference.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;4-unobserved-confounding&#34;&gt;4. Unobserved confounding&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When unconfoundedness fails: instruments, discontinuities, and sensitivity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-instrumental-variables/&#34;&gt;Notes on Instrumental Variables&lt;/a&gt; — from the linear constant-effect model to LATE.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-iv-free-methods/&#34;&gt;Notes on IV Free Methods&lt;/a&gt; — latent instruments and Gaussian copula approaches.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-control-function-method/&#34;&gt;Notes on Control Function Method&lt;/a&gt; — correcting endogeneity by modeling the first stage.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-causal-inference-with-no-overlap-regression-discontinuity/&#34;&gt;Regression Discontinuity&lt;/a&gt; — identification when treatment is assigned by a cutoff, so there is no overlap.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/hausman-taylor-estimator-notes/&#34;&gt;Hausman-Taylor Estimator Notes&lt;/a&gt; — an R example for panel data with time-invariant regressors and endogeneity.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-bound-ovb-in-causal-ml/&#34;&gt;Bounding OVB in Causal ML&lt;/a&gt; — sensitivity analysis for omitted-variable bias.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;5-panel-data-did-and-synthetic-control&#34;&gt;5. Panel data, DiD and synthetic control&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using time to build counterfactuals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-callaway-sant-anna-2021-staggered-adoption-did/&#34;&gt;Callaway &amp;amp; Sant&amp;rsquo;Anna (2021): Staggered Adoption DiD&lt;/a&gt; — group-time ATTs under staggered treatment timing.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-dml-for-did/&#34;&gt;Notes on DML for DiD&lt;/a&gt; — a unified debiased-ML approach to difference-in-differences.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/synthetic-control-notes/&#34;&gt;Notes on Synthetic Control&lt;/a&gt; — weighting donor units to reproduce the treated unit.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-augmented-synthetic-control-method/&#34;&gt;The Augmented Synthetic Control Method&lt;/a&gt; — bias correction when the synthetic control does not fit well.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-matrix-completion-methods/&#34;&gt;Matrix Completion for Causal Panel Data&lt;/a&gt; — imputing untreated outcomes with low-rank structure (Athey et al. 2021).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-interactive-fixed-effects/&#34;&gt;Notes on Interactive Fixed Effects&lt;/a&gt; — factor models for unobserved time-varying confounding (Bai 2009).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/same-root-different-leaves-time-series-and-cross-sectional-methods-in-panel-data/&#34;&gt;Same Root, Different Leaves&lt;/a&gt; — horizontal vs. vertical regression in panel data.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/triply-robust-panel-estimators-when-you-don-t-know-which-assumptions-hold/&#34;&gt;Triply Robust Panel Estimators&lt;/a&gt; — combining unit weights, time weights and outcome models.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/synthetic-controls-for-experimental-design-abadie-and-zhao-2025/&#34;&gt;Synthetic Controls for Experimental Design&lt;/a&gt; — choosing which units to treat (Abadie and Zhao 2025).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/conformal-inference-for-counterfactual-and-synthetic-controls/&#34;&gt;Conformal Inference for Counterfactual and Synthetic Controls&lt;/a&gt; — inference with a single treated unit as a residual-based test.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id=&#34;6-heterogeneity-survival-and-experiments&#34;&gt;6. Heterogeneity, survival and experiments&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Beyond the average effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/a-walkthrough-of-how-causal-forest-works/&#34;&gt;A Walkthrough of How Causal Forest Works&lt;/a&gt; — estimating heterogeneous treatment effects, following the grf tutorial.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/causal-survival-forest-notes/&#34;&gt;Notes on Causal Survival Forest&lt;/a&gt; — causal forests for right-censored outcomes (Cui et al. 2023).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/notes-on-doubly-robust-censoring-unbiased-transformation/&#34;&gt;Doubly Robust Censoring Unbiased Transformation&lt;/a&gt; — combining Buckley–James and IPCW into one doubly robust transformation (Rubin and van der Laan 2007).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/the-experimental-selection-correction-estimator-using-experiments-to-remove-biases-in-observational-estimates/&#34;&gt;The Experimental Selection Correction Estimator&lt;/a&gt; — combining experimental and observational data to remove bias (Athey, Chetty and Imbens).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Browse all notes by topic: &lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/category/causal-inference/&#34;&gt;Causal Inference&lt;/a&gt; · or see the &lt;a href=&#34;https://chenxing.space/blog/&#34;&gt;full blog archive&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
